Background: Recently the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission received petitions to change its basis for regulating radiation exposure. A copy of the statement in the Federal Register is attached. The basis of the petitions is that the “Linear No-Threshold Model” is ultra-simplistic and results in overly conservative and restrictive radiation protection regulations.
Check attached paper.
The assignment: Take a position for or against the petition to change the basis of the radiation protection regulations from the Linear No-Threshold (LNT) model to the radiation hormesis model. Argue in support of your position, drawing from what you have learned in class, and from any other source of information that you can document. You are free to discuss and debate this topic with your classmates, or anyone else. But your final product MUST be written in your own words.
The product: A written persuasive argument. It must be at least 5 pages, but no more than 10, in length, and include references. The references should be formatted in Chicago style. Font is Times New Roman, 11 point. Line spacing should be set to 1.5. Margins are 1” all sides on an 8 ½ x 11 paper.
Evaluation Criteria: You will be evaluated on the clarity of your argument and the evidence you find to support it. I encourage you to use your student access to the online Library to find appropriate journal articles to help you in this effort.
Place your order now to enjoy great discounts on this or a similar topic.
People choose us because we provide:
Essays written from scratch, 100% original,
Delivery within deadlines,
Competitive prices and excellent quality,
24/7 customer support,
Priority on their privacy,
Unlimited free revisions upon request, and
Plagiarism free work,