Changes suggested by the reviewers

Result of Review

 

Title: The Integrated Life Cycle Assessment and Optimization Approach for Automotive De-manufacturing Systems

 

Decision of Paper Selection

 

( ) A. Accept submission, no revisions required.

 

(*) B. Accept submission, revisions required; please revise the paper according to comments. ( ) C. Decline submission; you may revise and resubmit for review.

( ) D. Decline submission.

 

 

What should you do next? (Only for accepted papers, A & B)

 

  • Revise the paper according to the comments (if applicable).

 

  • All authors must agree on the publication; please inform us of agreement by e-mail.

 

  • Pay a publication fee of 100.00USD for the

 

 

  • Please notify the editorial assistant when payment has been made

 

 

Proposed Schedule for Publication (Only for accepted papers, A & B)

 

  • 5, No. 1, June 2016, if you meet above requirements within 2 weeks.

 

  • e-Version First: the online version may be published soon after the final draft is completed.
  • You may also ask to publish the paper later, if you need more time for revision or payment.

 

 

Additional Information (Only for accepted papers, A & B)

 

 

 

 

Comments from Editor

 

 

Evaluation Grade

 

Please give a grade of 5, 4, 3, 2, 1(high to low)

Overall evaluation of the paper 3
Contribution to existing knowledge 4
Organization and readability 2
Soundness of methodology 3
Evidence supports conclusion 4
Adequacy of literature review 3
Comments and Suggestions

 

Revise the paper according to Author Guidelines: http://author.macrothink.org

 

Add DOI persistent links to those references that have DOIs, please see Paper Submission Guide.

 

 

Comments from Reviewer A

 

v   Evaluation     (Please evaluate the manuscript by grade 1-5)
5=Excellent       4=Good       3=Average      2=Below Average    1=Poor
Items Grade
Contribution to existing knowledge 2
Organization and readability 4
Soundness of methodology 4
Evidence supports conclusion 1
Adequacy of literature review 4
Strengths

It is very interesting but evidences that support Authors’ proposal are too little.

Weaknesses
Suggestions to Author/s
v

 

 

Comments from Reviewer B

 

v   Evaluation     (Please evaluate the manuscript by grade 1-5)
5=Excellent       4=Good       3=Average      2=Below Average    1=Poor
Items Grade
Contribution to existing knowledge 2
Organization and readability 2
Soundness of methodology 1
Evidence supports conclusion 1
Adequacy of literature review 3
Strengths

v  Good overview of automotive de-manufacturing systems and legislative instruments for reassurance.

Weaknesses

v  Poor overall structure

v  Unclear contribution of the authors

v  Unclear research objectives and lack of evidence for their achievement

Suggestions to Author/s

Suggestions to author/s are given as comments directly in the manuscript document in pdf format, since the provided manuscript does not contain row numbering and it is very difficult for the reviewer to describe each of his comments. In parallel to the pdf version, the reviewer provides also the docx format of the revision, but only for the use of the editor, in order to keep anonymity.

p(10)

Place your order now to enjoy great discounts on this or a similar topic.

People choose us because we provide:

Essays written from scratch, 100% original,

Delivery within deadlines,

Competitive prices and excellent quality,

24/7 customer support,

Priority on their privacy,

Unlimited free revisions upon request, and

Plagiarism free work,

 

Unlike most other websites we deliver what we promise;

  • Our Support Staff are online 24/7
  • Our Writers are available 24/7
  • Most Urgent order is delivered with 6 Hrs
  • 100% Original Assignment Plagiarism report can be sent to you upon request.

GET 15 % DISCOUNT TODAY use the discount code PAPER15 at the order form.

Type of paper Academic level Subject area
Number of pages Paper urgency Cost per page:
 Total: